Prediction of Ruan Roelofse vs Nathaniel Lammons Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
R. Roelofse vs N. Lammons

Ruan Roelofse

RSA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

6'2" (188 cm)

Height

5'11" (180 cm)

Ret.

C. Rank

595

357

Best Rank

591

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$740

Career Money

Right-Handed

Plays

Right-Handed

Nathaniel Lammons

USA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

6'2" (188 cm)

Height

5'11" (180 cm)

Ret.

C. Rank

595

357

Best Rank

591

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$740

Career Money

Right-Handed

Plays

Right-Handed

Head-to-head: Roelofse 1 - 0 Lammons

They have played 2 sets in total, with Ruan Roelofse winning 2 and Nathaniel Lammons winning 0. The last match between Ruan Roelofse and Nathaniel Lammons was at the Cleveland Challenger, 10-02-2020, Round: Q3, Surface: I.hard, with Ruan Roelofse getting the victory 6-4 6-4.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Roelofse	1
Lammons	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(Q3) Cleveland Challenger(02-10-20)

Stats

Ruan Roelofse

Nathaniel Lammons

R. Roelofse vs N. Lammons H2H Profile

R. Roelofse	Stats	N. Lammons
$740	Career Prize Money	$0
53.92% (268-229)	Career Total W/L	53.42% (78-68)
1	Indoor	0
2	Titles	0
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

R. Roelofse vs N. Lammons Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Ruan Roelofse has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Nathaniel Lammons has won 65.38%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Ruan Roelofse, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Nathaniel Lammons has won 45.45%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 26.67% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Ruan Roelofse has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Nathaniel Lammons has saved 50.00% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Ruan Roelofse has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Nathaniel Lammons winning 0% (W/L 0/1) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Ruan Roelofse has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 56% (W/L 210/164), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 29% (W/L 2/5). Nathaniel Lammons has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 56% (W/L 50/33), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/1).
Player level: In the last year, Ruan Roelofse has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Nathaniel Lammons has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 0.00% of matches (W/L 0/1). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Ruan Roelofse winning 1 times and Nathaniel Lammons being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Ruan Roelofse winning 2 and Nathaniel Lammons winning 0.
The last match between Ruan Roelofse and Nathaniel Lammons was at the Cleveland Challenger, 10-02-2020, Round: Q3, Surface: I.hard, with Ruan Roelofse getting the victory 6-4 6-4.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:11:55.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Ruan Roelofse has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Nathaniel Lammons has played against players with an average rank of 867.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Ruan Roelofse has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Nathaniel Lammons has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Ruan Roelofse has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Nathaniel Lammons has converted 50.00% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Ruan Roelofse vs Nathaniel Lammons Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

R. Roelofse vs N. Lammons H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

R. Roelofse	Stats	N. Lammons
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	0
12	Games Won	8
8	Aces (Total)	10
4	Total Double Faults	4
1:11:55	Average Match Time	1:11:55
61% (36/59)	1st Serve %	44% (24/54)
83% (30/36)	1st Serve Win %	96% (23/24)
57% (13/23)	2nd Serve Win %	40% (12/30)
67% (2/3)	Break Pts Won %	0% (0/3)
35% (19/54)	Return Points Win %	27% (16/59)
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

R. Roelofse Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
M25 Calabasas - 21-03-2022
Q3 Kiranpal PannuK. Pannu	L	7-6(1) 6-4	Stats
Q1 Jurence Zosimo MendozaJ. Zosimo	W	6-3 2-2 ret.	Stats
M25 Bakersfield - 14-03-2022
Q1 Kyle KangK. Kang	L	6-4 6-1	Stats
Davis Cup, Group I, PO, ISR-RSA 3-1 - 28-02-2022
Rubber 2 Yshai OlielY. Oliel	L	6-2 6-3	Stats
M25 Cancun - 14-02-2022
Q3 Isaiah StrodeI. Strode	L	6-3 6-4	Stats

View All

N. Lammons Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Guangzhou Challenger - 08-09-2025
Q1 Tomohiro MasabayashiT. Masabayashi	L	5-7 7-5 1-2 ret.	Stats
Charlottesville Challenger - 01-11-2021
Q1 Gijs BrouwerG. Brouwer	L	6-0 6-2	Stats
Mouilleron-Le-Captif Challenger - 04-10-2021
Q1 Mats RosenkranzM. Rosenkranz	L	6-4 4-6 7-6(4)	Stats
Szczecin Challenger - 13-09-2021
Q1 Nicola KuhnN. Kuhn	L	6-3 6-4	Stats
Nottingham 1 Challenger - 07-06-2021
Q1 Borna GojoB. Gojo	L	7-6(2) 6-7(9) 6-4	Stats

View All

R. Roelofse vs N. Lammons Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

R. Roelofse	Stats	N. Lammons
53.92% (268/229)	YTD Win/Loss	53.42% (78/68)
53.63% (599/518)	Sets Win/Loss	55.46% (188/151)
51.71% (5541/5174)	Games Win/Loss	52.85% (1681/1500)
56.15% (210/164)	Hard Win/Loss	60.24% (50/33)
46.43% (26/30)	Clay Win/Loss	45.45% (10/12)
50.00% (30/30)	Indoor Hard W/L	45.00% (18/22)
28.57% (2/5)	Grass Win/Loss	0.00% (0/1)
0.23	Aces Per Game	0.3
1225	Aces Total	463
0.12	Double Faults Per Game	0.15
617	Total Double Faults	233
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
575.66	Average Opponent Rank	396.46
61% (8076/13295)	1st Serve %	60% (3350/5549)
73% (5888/8076)	1st Serve Win %	70% (2359/3350)
52% (2689/5219)	2nd Serve Win %	48% (1061/2199)
39% (400/1022)	Break Points Won % (Total)	40% (162/401)
35% (4693/13323)	Return Points Win %	35% (1907/5473)
20.00% (2/8)	Cups W/L	0% (0/0)
25.00% (1/3)	Main Tour W/L	0% (0/0)
45.81% (71/84)	Challenger W/L	33.33% (13/26)
59.15% (194/134)	Futures W/L	60.75% (65/42)
54% (262/485)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	54% (78/145)
29% (2/7)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	0% (0/1)
49% (88/179)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	52% (24/46)
47% (55/117)	Deciding Set Win %	35% (16/46)
88% (277/244)	1st Set Won, Won Match	82% (83/68)
12% (277/33)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	18% (83/15)
11% (220/24)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	17% (63/11)